[NeilB@earthling.net: Re: macros with traditional cpp]

[Neil Booth]

Jamie Lokier wrote:-

> Ah yes, that is one form of a varargs bug I've been meaning to report.
> I've got macros which work fine with GCC 2.95, but don't work with _or_
> without -traditional now.  (Sorry, I'll try to provide an example
> tomorrow).

You should have no problems with C99 syntax, or the GNU named varargs
extension, unless you're using it in some really perverse way.  (You
are using the latest CVS, right?)

tradcpp certainly doesn't support C99, and may not support the GNU
extension.  If you want that, you need to use non-traditional.

Neil.