An article about the Cygnus tree
Mon Sep 4 18:15:00 GMT 2000
David Edelsohn <email@example.com> wrote:
> I do not understand why you incorrectly insist on using such
> hostile and confrontational language in your description of EGCS.
I certainly didn't mean to be hostile or confrontational to the former EGCS. If
something in my description of it appears hostile or confrontational to you,
please point it out, also indicating how you would like it to be different (in
diff -c format).
Now you may find hostile or confrontational my criticism of first EGCS' and now
GCC's reluctance to move to the unified tree, but I think it's fair criticism.
Sorry guys for hurting your feelings if I did. I didn't intend to. I just want
the unified tree to become a reality, and in the current state of affairs there
isn't even a site or a mailing list for the Cygnus tree overall, necessitating
something like my article to be written to get the ball rolling.
Michael Sokolov Harhan Engineering Laboratory
Public Service Agent International Free Computing Task Force
International Engineering and Science Task Force
615 N GOOD LATIMER EXPY STE #4
DALLAS TX 75204-5852 USA
Phone: +1-214-824-7693 (Harhan Eng Lab office)
E-mail: msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (ARPA TCP/SMTP) (UUCP coming soon)
More information about the Gcc