On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Franz Sirl wrote: > > One thing is not clear to me though, do I need to revert this patch: > > * reload1.c (reload_reg_free_for_value_p): Don't use a register > that is in reload_reg_used. > > Or does your patch fixup this too? It's fixed; the relevant part is the reload_reg_unavailable stuff. Bernd