repository [was: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?]

[Geoff Keating]

> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:02:39 -0600 (MDT)
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> CC: law@cygnus.com, guerby@acm.org, dewar@gnat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> cc: rms@gnu.org
> Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
> 
>     * I question as to whether any "neutral GNU site"s exist with
>     the capacity to provide such a service.  I don't believe the FSF has
>     the resources or competence by itself;
> 
> I could try to defend the people who run our CVS server, but there is
> a more important thing to be said here: you're making a hostile
> supposition about another part of the GNU Project, and that is not
> the right way to treat other GNU contributors.

Oops!

I'm sorry.  I had completely forgotten about subversions.  I certainly
didn't mean to impute anything about its admins, and apologize to
anyone I might have offended.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>