Unifying Bug Reporting Instructions
Gerald Pfeifer
pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Thu Oct 12 15:41:00 GMT 2000
I have not received any objections to the following proposal.
Unless I receive any such objections, I plan to remove the redundancy (and
inconsistency) in our bug reporting instructions by removing them from the
texinfo documentation and only referring to the web pages and GNATS.
Thoughts?
Gerald
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: dl8bcu@gmx.net, Martin v. Loewis <martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:46:17 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: reporting bugs
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
> Perhaps you could explicitely mention the report confirmation in the docs.
Martin, that sounds like a useful addition. Would you mind adding that?
> Ok - but don't point back to the online version then! I think it is ok
> to say in the online version 'this is a summary, look into the info
> manual for details'. It's just very irritating to be referred from the
> detailed version to the summary.
I agree. If we keep to sets of bug reporting instructions (see below),
the I believe we should annotate the links, e.g.,
o The web page says: "This is a brief version of our bug reporting
instructions which may contain up-to-date information that is not
yet present in the copy of the manual you may have..."
o The manual says: "This is the full version of our bug reporting
instructions. At ... you will find a brief version that also may
contain up-to-date information that was not available at the time
we prepared this manual.".
>> The authorative source of information is the manual. Unfortunately, we
>> can't update the manual on each user's system, so we have to have more
>> recent information on-line - like the existence of GNATS.
Well, it is not right now and cannot be in general, unless one only deals
with current snapshots, as evidenced by the introduction of GNATS.
> Please keep in mind that this is from the perspective of a gcc-user who
> never intended to do actual gcc develompent.
I agree. As one already has to be essentially online to report a bug, I
propose to remove the bug instructions from the manual and only have a
single source of bug reporting instructions -- the online ones.
Having to maintain two sets of information, one synchronously and one
asynchronously, usually causes all sorts of synchronization and other
problems.
Gerald
More information about the Gcc
mailing list