Why not gnat Ada in gcc?

[Robert Dewar]

<<I would claim the opposite.  We need this to happen sooner, not later.
The longer we wait, the more difficult our work becomes and the longer
we have to deal with the problem of developers making changes, but
being unable to test that they haven't broken Ada.
>>

Well the main burden of testing has to remain with ACT, because only we
have the full test suite. This test suite cannot be made available publicly
because it contains millions of lines of proprietary code. However, we can
make the ACVC (now ACATS test suite available), since that suite is public,
and this will go a long way to solving such problems. There is also a small
amount of additional (but useful) test program material that ACT will be
able to supply for this purpose.