Results for 2.97 20001120 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 with -mcpu=ultrasparc -m64

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:19:07PM -0500, Brad Lucier wrote:
> This message does not contain the actual test results, because they
> were just bounced by the gcc.gnu.org mail handler for being over
> 200,000 bytes in size!
> 
> But I do have a question:  The results of gcc testing on this target
> are not so great with 32-bit code (89 failures in gcc), see, e.g.,
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2000-11/msg00185.html
> 
> but they are absolutely abysmal for 64-bit code (with -mcpu=ultrasparc -m64).
> 
> Is Jakub's work on the subreg-byte branch an attempt to fix this?

I'd say it this way:

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            12819
# of unexpected failures        15
# of expected failures          56
# of unsupported tests          41
/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/gcc-2.96-20000731/obj-sparc64-redhat-linux/gcc/xgcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0)

(-mcpu=ultrasparc -m64; this compiler has subreg byte patch in).

	Jakub