EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names

[law@redhat.com]

  In message <Pine.BSF.4.30.0011101851440.24852-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.a
t>you write:
  > Really? All that would do is to allow people to continue checking out
  > "egcs", as far as I understood CVS modules. Do we really need that? Or
  > is it just that I don't fully understand CVS modules (which is likely
  > anyway <g>).
You're right.   I had initially thought it was needed for folks that already
had it checked out under the name "egcs", but that's not true.  Let's zap it.
jeff