Why not gnat Ada in gcc?

[Robert Dewar]

<<Meanwhile, I have to wonder why running GNU Ada on a popular version
of the GNU system needs the attention of a group outside the core
developers of GNU Ada.  Supporting GNU/Linu ought to be one of the
main priorities of the core group.
>>

Once again, is it really the case that the GNU project routinely
prepares Redhat Linux and Suse Linux RPM's (note I somewhat deliberately
am using Linux rather than GNU/Linux in this sentence, since I am quoting
the names of commercial products, and these companies do not use the
term GNU/Linux). We certainly have not seen this as a main priority.
We do see it as a priority to provide standard easily installable
binary releases for GNU/Linux.