C99 status.html query

Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk
Wed Nov 1 16:18:00 GMT 2000


On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Neil Booth wrote:

> So what is not right in the current implementation?

Zack Weinberg said it was broken in July based on a different reading
( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-07/msg00471.html ).  If you read it
the way I now do, and the search rules for both <> and "" includes are
documented (including the default search directories - why doesn't gcc
-print-search-dirs print them?), then it can probably be marked Done.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk



More information about the Gcc mailing list