C99 status.html query
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
Wed Nov 1 16:18:00 GMT 2000
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Neil Booth wrote:
> So what is not right in the current implementation?
Zack Weinberg said it was broken in July based on a different reading
( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-07/msg00471.html ). If you read it
the way I now do, and the search rules for both <> and "" includes are
documented (including the default search directories - why doesn't gcc
-print-search-dirs print them?), then it can probably be marked Done.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
More information about the Gcc
mailing list