new automated testing facility now operational
Michael Meissner
meissner@cygnus.com
Thu Mar 30 17:01:00 GMT 2000
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 04:30:02PM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote:
> > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@cygnus.com>
> > Organization: Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat Company
>
> > On Mar 30, 2000, Geoff Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I am now running a service which automatically and continuously tests
> > > th GCC CVS archive whenever a commit is made, and sends mail to the
> > > people making the commit if a regression is detected.
> >
> > Cool! Could it Cc: some mailing list? gcc-bugs, or some other
> > created specifically for this purpose?
>
> It should. I think it should be a new list since the messages are
> automated and relatively frequent.
>
> > > Instead, it builds a cross compiler to the target 'powerpc-eabisim'.
> >
> > It would be nice to have a couple of different targets, instead of
> > just powerpc-eabi, and we could hold the state of the last build on
> > each target.
>
> I chose powerpc-eabi because it was the most stable target which had a
> freely available simulator. The other targets that have simulators
> are arm, d10v, d30v, erc32, fr30, h8300, h8500, i960, m32r, mcore,
> mips, mn10200, mn10300, sh, v860, w65, and z8k; of those, I think
> i960, mips, arm, and sh are also reasonable targets to try running
> tests with.
Well d10v/d30v aren't yet in the FSF tree, and v860 is really v850. I suspect
the z8k is rather dead.
> At the moment, though, I have no spare machines and would like to
> start small, with just one target. Maybe in a month or two, it can be
> extended. I'd really like to test on a less-RISC chip, perhaps i960?
>
> --
> - Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>
--
Michael Meissner, Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company.
PMB 198, 174 Littleton Road #3, Westford, Massachusetts 01886, USA
Work: meissner@redhat.com phone: +1 978-486-9304
Non-work: meissner@spectacle-pond.org fax: +1 978-692-4482
More information about the Gcc
mailing list