tail calls in const functions?
Jeffrey A Law
law@cygnus.com
Thu Mar 23 14:47:00 GMT 2000
In message < 20000323232003.B5316@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz >you write:
> OK.
> I was bringing this issue mainly because I was unsure whther we want to rea
> d it
> again or not. In the example I gave the caller was storing value "1" twice
> to
> the same position once for first function, later for the second. I was uns
> ure
> whther we would not want to implement later pass that will eliminate the se
> cond
> sture.
>
> With const fuctions modifying their arguemnt area we will have to hack
> this future pass for such special case.
We must always consider the argument area clobbered by a call, even to a
const function.
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list