Selectiv on/off-turning of warnings
Joern Rennecke
amylaar@cygnus.co.uk
Thu Mar 23 05:05:00 GMT 2000
> I think there would be a long debate whether it is reasonable. For one
> thing, some people claim that #pragma is not reasonable. Since the
> standard says a compiler can do anything it wants when it sees a
> #pragma, I believe some version of gcc used to invoke Emacs when it
> saw a #pragma :-)
The code is still in cccp.c, although it is #ifdefed out these days:
#if 0
/* This was a fun hack, but #pragma seems to start to be useful.
By failing to recognize it, we pass it through unchanged to cc1. */
/* The behavior of the #pragma directive is implementation defined.
this implementation defines it as follows. */
static int
do_pragma ()
{
close (0);
if (open ("/dev/tty", O_RDONLY, 0666) != 0)
goto nope;
close (1);
if (open ("/dev/tty", O_WRONLY, 0666) != 1)
goto nope;
execl ("/usr/games/hack", "#pragma", 0);
execl ("/usr/games/rogue", "#pragma", 0);
execl ("/usr/new/emacs", "-f", "hanoi", "9", "-kill", 0);
execl ("/usr/local/emacs", "-f", "hanoi", "9", "-kill", 0);
nope:
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different");
}
#endif
More information about the Gcc
mailing list