Update to c9xstatus.html

[Martin v. Loewis]

Joseph,

Thanks for these pointers and the discussion; they make an interesting
reading.

>     http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/dr_219.htm

Breaking my promise not to discuss standards issues on the gcc list:

I can't see the defect in the report. For p1, the "object from which
the value is copied" is not s, but s1.i, so the effective type of p1
is certainly "int". As for p2: this seems more tricky; it copies s.i
and s.l, which, as a pair, has no declared type, so p2 has no
effective type.

Regards,
Martin