Maintainers list

[Philipp Thomas]

* Martin v. Loewis (martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de) [20000609 12:01]:

> Of course, before that is set up, maintainers should indicate whether
> they'd prefer such a procedure to the current one.

At least I would be all for it.

> On the plus side, it is easy to tell what the pending patches are, and
> maintainers don't have to organize that in their mail folders,
> instead, they can trust that GNATS keeps track.

Yepp, and everybody would be able to browse that info and look for
themselves. 

BTW, would it be possible to have GNATS bug the responsible maintainer if a
patch hasn't been reviewed for a given period?

Philipp

-- 
Philipp Thomas <pthomas@suse.de>
Development, SuSE GmbH, Schanzaecker Str. 10, D-90443 Nuremberg, Germany

#define NINODE  50              /* number of in core inodes */
#define NPROC   30              /* max number of processes */
 	-- Version 7 UNIX for PDP 11, /usr/include/sys/param.h