Potential bug in stmt.c (expand_value_return)

Denis Chertykov denisc@overta.ru
Tue Feb 8 11:30:00 GMT 2000

Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru> writes:

> I have founded bug in stmt.c (expand_value_return) which actual for my
> AVR port.
> `expand_value_return' first generates move insn for return_reg
> and after that generates stack adjust insn.
> AVR port can't adjust stack without additional register.
> reload pass allocates such register, but this register equal to
> return_reg - it's a bug.

This bug steel exists in latest CVS version of stmt.c.

Why my patch isn't applyed ?
Am I wrong ?


More information about the Gcc mailing list