Support

[Galloway, Greg (ISSAtlanta)]

Russ Allbery [ mailto:rra@stanford.edu ] wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> writes:
> 
> > Nope.  No gcc release prior to 2.96 or 2.97 or 3.0 or 
> however the next
> > release ends up being called supports HP/UX 11.
> 
> Could someone clarify (or point me at the clarification) of 
> just what this
> means?  I'm surprised by this, given that it compiles cleanly 
> out of the
> tarball and compiles Perl with no test suite failures.

This is my experience as well.  I've built cleanly out of the
box with gas from binutils 2.9.1.  Is there a list of known problems
somewhere?

Thanks,
Greg