Bug in loop optimize (invalid postinc to preinc transformation)

[Toon Moene]

dewar@gnat.com wrote:

> <<Quite.  There's a pointer constant in the offending code.  It's not in
> any array.  Do we offer implementation defined behaviour for numerical
> pointer constants or not?  They do come in useful occasionally.
> >>

> It is hard NOT to offer implementation defined behavior :-)

Robert has spent too many hours in Standardization Committees.

Sorry, couldn't resist :-)

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)