RFA: how to handle union wait portably?
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Sat Dec 30 11:03:00 GMT 2000
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 09:38:01PM -0800, Michael Sokolov wrote:
> How would it know that it ought not be able to compile something that
> compiles and works 100% correctly? By ESP?
By writing code that should return an error from the
compiler but doesn't.
> Would you mind using more respectful terminology? PCC is not broken...
Yes it is. Forget ISO C, the language definition I know as K&R
doesn't allow nonsense like applying structure member tags to
non-structures. Or for that matter, applying structure member
tags to structures that do not contain that member, which IIRC
is another PCC bug.
And please leave off with the advocacy. It's tiring.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list