RFC: Moving Java PRs to Gcc database

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On 13 Dec 2000, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> Please consider which lists you want to keep (I believe some are won't
>> be needed any longer)
> I'd actually like to keep them all.
>
> gcc-patches is only rarely relevant to the Java hackers.  I'd prefer
> it if we could keep java-patches.  Likewise I'd prefer if Java commit
> messages went to a special list (perhaps in addition to the gcc commit
> list).  I think we can easily configure Gnats so that Java PRs are CCd
> to java-prs.

If you only want to keep those three lists, that means you do *not* want
to keep them all! :-)

There's also java-testresults (empty)
             java-announce (only five mails this year)
         and java-discuss.

At least java-testresults seems dead, but personally I'd leave the
decision to you (the Java folks) in all these cases, as long as all
patches eventually go to gcc-patches as well (as we've already have
it).

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/