Stepanov results with development gcc

[Daniel Berlin]

David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:

> 	Something seems strange with these results.  2.95.1 was perfect?
> 2.95.2 was perfect?

Yes.
In fact, on a gnupro 99r1 based branch compiler (BeOS) on x86, which is the
same time frame, we have better than perfect.
It's like .7 or .8.

> 
> 	My results for abstraction penalty using gcc -O2 on AIX are:
> 
> 	gcc-2.95.2 = 1.23-1.24
> 	gcc-2.95.3 = 1.22-1.29
> 
> 	I do not have a current development gcc to test.
> 
> David