On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 02:25:42PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > Yes! That's just the point I was trying to make. We can't create > just plain "libgcc.so", but rather "libgcc.so.1.0". Oh, so this has all been one big misunderstanding? I never suggested that we do the former, I've just been using that as shorthand. r~