cp/inc licensing

[Benjamin Kosnik]

I was under the impression that the v3 license is all groovy with RMS. 
That's certainly the intention. 

I don't know if the shared thing needs to be explictly stated? If so, can 
somebody  propose language to cover this?

Here's a libstdc++ discussion of the current libstdc++-v3 licensing: read 
this thread for more detail on specifics and whys/wherefores.

http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/libstdc++/2000-q2/msg00050.html

-benjamin



On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

>  In message < 200004280059.RAA00533@haight.constant.com >you write:
>   > 
>   > let's have <new> match the v-3 license if at all possible please. This
>   > includes this bit:
> If we're going to use anything other than the existing libgcc, then it has
> to be OK'd by RMS.
> 
> jeff
> 
>