gcc build status page
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@cygnus.com
Mon Apr 10 13:53:00 GMT 2000
On Apr 10, 2000, rdk@empire.com (Bobby Krupczak) wrote:
> Hi!
>> But have you been using it intensively? C++ too?
> The tone of the question frightens me. Should I be using an earlier
> version of gcc on Solaris 8?
Nope. If GCC 2.95.2 happens to not work well on Solaris 8, previous
versions will certainly not work any better.
> Im not using c++. What gotchas should I be concerned about?
Dunno. I just mentioned C++ because that's what often triggers the
red alert for people who *thought* they got GCC working on a
non-supported platform, such as DU 5 and HP/UX 11.
> Yikes! Thanks for the warning. Do you guys have a preferred release
> that I should be using for Solaris 8 32-bit?
Nope. AFAIK, GCC 2.95.2 doesn't officially support Solaris 8. But
maybe it just works.
It's just that we can't list Solaris 8 as one of the supported
platforms before we're sure it really works well :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaraná, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
More information about the Gcc
mailing list