Named Return Value Extension Proposal

[Martin v. Loewis]

>     E>   I am simply proposing a stop gap to carry us through until it
>     E> is possible to implement the optimizations.
> 
> We have too many such stop-gaps already in g++.  We really don't want
> to add additional language extensions at this point, IMO.

Which brings us back to a thread of a few days ago :-) If somehow
appears an implementation of such a stop-gap, and it is clean in the
sense that it doesn't break anything and is easily maintainable, and
it solves a real need - I would be in favour of accepting such an
implementation.

Of course, I would never consider doing it myself, for the reasons
you've mentioned.

Regards,
Martin