Fwd: Questions on PA machine description?
Richard Henderson
rth@cygnus.com
Wed Mar 31 23:46:00 GMT 1999
On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 01:48:56PM -0500, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> At line 6947, there's still a dependency on `i'. Should this just be
> removed, or what? I know less than nothing about speculative motion:
>
> if (!check_live (insn, INSN_BB (insn)))
> {
> /* speculative motion, live check failed, remove
> insn from ready list */
> ready[i] = ready[--n_ready];
Yeah, that line should have vanished.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list