Fwd: Questions on PA machine description?

Richard Henderson rth@cygnus.com
Wed Mar 31 23:46:00 GMT 1999


On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 01:48:56PM -0500, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> At line 6947, there's still a dependency on `i'.  Should this just be
> removed, or what?  I know less than nothing about speculative motion:
> 
> 		      if (!check_live (insn, INSN_BB (insn)))
> 			{
> 			  /* speculative motion, live check failed, remove
> 			     insn from ready list */
> 			  ready[i] = ready[--n_ready];

Yeah, that line should have vanished.


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list