On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 01:37:13PM -0600, Jiann-Ming Su wrote: > > Erum, but we don't _want_ to just "slot in" the GEM back end, > > even if the design of gcc allowed it. > > Ok, I'll bite. Why not? 5 gets you 10 is isn't flexible enough to handle the breadth of targets gcc supports. r~