Why don't we just FIX the damn vthunk problem?

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 199903011934.LAA12229@Canada.AI.SRI.COM >you write:
  > It is interesting then that introducing a warning in
  > expand_indirect_vtbls_init to accompany the
  > 	      /* We don't have dynamic thunks yet!
  > 		 So for now, just fail silently.  */
  > comment causes more than a half-dozen warnings when compiling
  > libstdc++.
Yes, that is rather disturbing.  Particularly when this this case is supposed
to be extremely rare.

Anyway, thanks for getting the ball rolling on this, it's a long standing
issue that needs to be resolved.


jeff