patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT

[espie@quatramaran.ens.fr]

In article <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com> you write:
[about TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT and TARGET_DEFAULT for x86]

>What John is rightly saying is that someone typo'd in this
>particular instance.

when I sit down and wrote the openbsd port, I looked at TARGET_DEFAULT,
TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT, and put the current solution in
(a target_cpu_default="MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387").

Are you saying that I should reconsider and override TARGET_DEFAULT instead ?
What I did looked like a fairly good decision at the time... I followed the
same rationale that Jeff outlined basically.

If there are further issues involved in TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT vs. TARGET_DEFAULT,
I'd like to be aware of these. As far as I know, there is not even any written
documentation of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT currently... maybe this should change ?