snapshot 19990608 libstdc++ check error

[Robert Lipe]

> The following fixes listed in fixinc.svr4 don't seem to be needed on DG/UX:
> 
> 23) Replacing sys/byteorder.h (DG/UX headers already optimize using asm() instructions)

Several SVR[45] optimize them using asms for the native compiler. [ I
submitted a patch to "cure" this but it hasn't been accepted yet. ] Are
the asm's in your headers compatible with the asms that GCC will accept?

> So, what's next.  

In the long term, you'll benefit from reduced maintenance.  In the short
term, you can probably activate fast fixincludes easier than you can
graft the five patches you need out of fixinc.svr4 and into fixinc.dgux.
As a recurring cost, you'll probably find fast-fixincludes, well,
faster.

> Do I follow Robert's advice and try to convert to fast-fixincludes?

That's my advice, and I'm-a-stickin' to it....

...unless someone more convincing than me advises otherwise. :-)

RJL