Internal macros as fns for debug (was: Re: regno_reg_rtx and relatedmacros)
Hans-Peter Nilsson
hp@bitrange.com
Tue Dec 21 12:01:00 GMT 1999
Geoff Keating wrote:
> if we have a macro
>
> #define FOO(a,b,c) some_huge_computation + a + b + c
>
> then, in a separate source file, do
>
> int (FOO) (int a, int b, int c) { return FOO(a,b,c); }
>
> this way you can write
>
> print FOO(aa,bb,cc)
>
> in the debugger.
>
> This would be particularly useful for all those RTX accessor macros so
> you don't have to remember which rtunion field you should be looking
> at, and can copy-and-paste from source files into the debugger.
Have you (or anybody else) started doing this, at least for
rtl-accessors?
If not, I'll do it right away. An exercise if nothing else.
Sketches:
- Prototypes in rtl.h
- Functions in (new) internal-debug.c (or keep them in rtl.c?)
- Functions and declaration guarded by autoconf macro
(HAVE_MACRONAME_AS_IDENTIFIER) for the benefit of bootstrapping
from broken preprocessors that don't like the same token as macro
and identifier token - if there are any.
Anyway, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to you all.
brgds, H-P
More information about the Gcc
mailing list