built gcc 2.95 on i386-pc-bsdi3.1

[John Wehle]

> So if `filds' is an illegal instruction, is gcc 2.95's `configure'
> script wrong in defining HAVE_GAS_FILDS_FISTS? I'm >90% sure I've seen
> it defining that...

`filds' isn't an illegal instruction, however it is spelled differently
depending on what assembler you are using.  Most assemblers seem to
spell it `fild', some old versions of gas spell it `filds'.  The problem
you've encountered can happen if configure finds a different assembler
from what is used at run time.

-- John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   Feith Systems  |   Voice: 1-215-646-8000  |  Email: john@feith.com  |
|    John Wehle    |     Fax: 1-215-540-5495  |                         |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------