x86 REG_DEAD note lacking after split

[Richard Henderson]

On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 02:30:30PM -0400, John Wehle wrote:
> > One of solution is to write splitters but keep the original insn pattern
> > (ugly)
> 
> A nice simple solution that didn't occur to me.  The original insn pattern
> has some characteristics I don't like, however a variation on it should
> work fine.  It doesn't even seem that ugly to me.

This is, I think, the prefered method until regstack is rewritten.


r~