No Subject

[Jeffrey A Law]

------- Forwarded Message

- ------- Start of forwarded message -------

Sender: Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: C++: STL 3.2
References: < Pine.GSO.4.10.9904231640040.22202-100000@markab.dbai.tuwien.ac.at >
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
In-Reply-To: Gerald Pfeifer's message of "Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:44:13 +0200 (MET 
DST)"
Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS URA 1611 (France)
Date: 23 Apr 1999 17:22:20 +0200
Message-ID: <flr9pbfjkj.fsf@poivre.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/Emacs 19.34

Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

| STL 3.2 has been release yesterday:
|   http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/whats_new.html
| 
| This missed the "Feature freeze date" by one day, but -- considering the
| relatively long life of our release branches and the usually high quality
| of SGI STL releases -- may I suggest that we merge that in for 1.2?

At this moment, we (on libstdc++-v3) haven't yet make a decision about
which version of <limits>, <valarray> we're going to use. On the other
hand, SGI <valarray> seems to be a replicata of <vector>. May I
suggest to delay the merge?

- -- Gaby

- ------- End of forwarded message -------

------- End of Forwarded Message