GCC2 merging (was "native language support now available")

[Alexandre Oliva]

John Vickers <jvickers@acorn.com> writes:

> I haven't seen a whole lot of traffic on gcc2 regarding testsuite
> results or testing by building known packages (or regarding anything
> else for that matter).

> Maybe you do a load of testing, & don't talk to anyone about it ?

I haven't been testing gcc2 any more, because it doesn't include a
testsuite, which makes testing it much harder than egcs.  Furthermore, 
I don't believe gcc2 is going to evolve any more.  I see no reason to
work on it, since egcs is doing that well.

> Perhaps it's time to drop the "experimental", which was only
> ever really a polite fiction.

How about replacing `experimental' with `extended'?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva
mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:aoliva@acm.org
http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil