egcs 1.1 error under Linux

Alex Buell alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk
Sat Sep 5 04:45:00 GMT 1998


On Fri, 4 Sep 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

>   >   Also, is it just my imagination or is egcs 1.1 slower than 1.0.3a?
> We'd need a testcase :-)
> 
> It's certainly possible since egcs-1.1 includes a global cse pass
> which egcs-1.0.3 did not have.

I was confused by his statement; did he mean that the generated code is
slower *OR* did he mean that the compiler is slower to generate code? :o) 

I'm all for anything that can generate faster/smaller code, even if it
takes a little bit longer.  

Cheers,
Alex
--
 /\_/\  Legalise cannabis now! 
( o.o ) Grow some cannabis today!
 > ^ <  Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.

http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk




More information about the Gcc mailing list