on non-rtl function info
Joern Rennecke
amylaar@cygnus.co.uk
Tue Oct 13 16:41:00 GMT 1998
> > On the subject of the first, I'm not sure what is the best thing to do.
> > Something that came to mind was having documented global stores of such
> > information. Each passes would record when something it does kills the
> > information, and each pass would begin with assertions that verify that
> > the required info is still live, possibly regenerating it if not.
> That may be OK short term, but long term we should be thinking about using
> data structures that we can update on the fly or incrementally at the end
> of a pass.
Hmmm, we have this with REG_DEAD notes in reload - if
PRESERVE_DEATH_INFO_REGNO_P is defined - and are moving away from it...
More information about the Gcc
mailing list