scheduling problems again

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 19980128231608.42139@cerebro.laendle >you write:
  > Well, but the transformation jump wanted to do was not only legal
  > but code-improving.. having correct death notes would improve
  > the code.
Yup.  There's a variety of places where having this information
would allow the compiler to generate better code.  This may fall
out of the splitting work since it requires 100% accurate information
about what's dead and what's live at any given instruction.

  > anyway, if you can't rely on deathnotes, you shouldn't be using
  > jump_optimize anyway, since most of it's work (removing
  > conditional jumps) requires death notes.
Huh?  jump does lots of other stuff other than just removing
conditional jumps....

jeff