egcs 1.0 and hp-ux 10.20 on a D class.
Lassi A. Tuura
lat@afsmail.cern.ch
Sat Jan 3 07:41:00 GMT 1998
On Sat, 27 Dec 1997, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > BTW, is there a reason why I haven't heard anything back from those
> > patches? Was something wrong with them?
> The basic problem is none of the configure scripts is prepared to
> deal with hppa2*. ie, if we make the change, lots of stuff is not
> going to work anymore because the various tools aren't set up to
> handle config.guess returning hppa2*.
>
> It's not ming-boggling work to do, but rather time consuming.
Hm, would it be possible to temporarily return hppa1.1 for hppa2.0
processors? I admit it is not a perfect solution, but at least to me it
seems better than sticking to hppa1.0 for all those 8xx series machines.
I can send a patch modified like this if you like.
BTW, I must say I know nothing about hppa2.0 since we don't yet have any
around here.
> I didn't respond directly because I thought Richard Kenner would
> have done so (since he asked me about it soon after you posted them
> to gcc2).
Well, I never did get any response, either because none was sent or
perhaps because it got lost on its way. Should I resend the patch to
gcc2?
Cheers,
//lat
--
Lassi.Tuura@cern.ch There's no sunrise without a night
More information about the Gcc
mailing list