build failure of egcs-980214 on sparc (patch)
Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de
Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de
Mon Feb 16 03:20:00 GMT 1998
On , 16 February 1998, 02:00:21, oliva@dcc.unicamp.br wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Looks like SunOS [45]'s /bin/sh doesn't like strings like
>
>
> "PICFLAGS=`case "..." ...`"
>
> It thinks the second quote matches the first one, and the subshell
> loses.
>
> A patch that fixes this problem is attached.
No, that's not correct. The patch which introduced this PICFLAGS=... stuff
wasn't actually completely applied. A hunk for toplevel Makefile.in is
missing. This is what I got:
On Sun, 15 February 1998, 21:25:39, law@hurl.cygnus.com wrote:
>
> In message <199802151213.NAA31447@saturn.s-direktnet.de>you write:
> > Although the ChangeLog entry is there, the patch for Makefile.in is
> > missing in the current CVS sources.
> >
> > Sun Feb 15 13:11:15 1998 Manfred Hollstein <manfred@s-direktnet.de>
> >
> > * Makefile.in (BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS): Don't pass PICFLAG and
> > PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
> > (EXTRA_TARGET_FLAGS): Don't pass PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
> Weird. Not sure what happened to it.
>
> Please install this change. (Boy it's nice to be able to say that :-)
>
>
> Thanks!
> jeff
I'll send an e-mail when I'll be finished with this (it's my first change
I'm gonna add myself to CVS ;-)
Manfred
More information about the Gcc
mailing list