egcs 1.0.2

[Joe Buck]

> I have 8 patches for egcs 1.0.2. I have sent 3 of them, which have
> yet to be acked. Should I send my other 5 or should I wait for
> the backlog to be cleared first?

I gather that there is controversy about spending a lot of effort to
fix "long double" in a minor release.  I would think that if these
changes will not affect code that does not use long double they will
at least do no harm, and not being able to build glibc does make us
look bad.