> > On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, you wrote: > > >> Below I have a program that dies under egcs1.0.1+glibc. There may be = > =3D > a=3D0D > >=3D09=3D09=3D09=3D09^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^=3D0D > =3D0D > >That is a bad combination.=3D0D > > I wonder why... > egcs 1.0.1 miscompiles glibc, especially long double. -- H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)