A new test case

[H.J. Lu]

> 
> Is there some other way to test for the bug?  It looks like you're
> just peeking at the sign bit, why can't you write the test so that
> it checks a value against zero to determine its sign.
> 
> And just because it's in the testsuite doesn't mean it will be fixed
> for 1.0.2.  1.0.2 is for critical bugs only.  You've said nothing about 
> when this bug occurs and thus we can't judge how serious it is.
> 

I have sent a patch for it. Please check out my message for
"An important patch for egcs 1.0.1."

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)