Implications of tighter integration of libg++

[H.J. Lu]

> 
> 
> >   > It is desirable to place libraries compiled against and dependent upon
> >   > a given version of g++, and their related header files, into the
> >   > compiler's lib and include directory.
> 
> Yes, but once we have complete standards conformance, we should get to the
> point where libstdc++ always has the exact same API, so this kind of

Did you mean ABI or API? With the old g++, API might be the same. But
ABI changed. I was talking about vtable and name mangling.

> dependency doesn't really exist.  I think that the compiler-specific
> lib directory really makes sense only for static libraries, not shared
> libraries.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)