Direct CVS Access to egcs sources
Jeffrey A Law
law@cygnus.com
Sun Feb 8 15:38:00 GMT 1998
In message < m0y1eB7-0004ecC@ocean.lucon.org >you write:
> > How about we continue to bump the version # for snapshots, but change
> > the "date" string via a nightly cron job?
> >
> > I just don't see the need at this point to bump the version # at each
> > checkin -- that (of course) can change if we have a difficult time
> > interpreting test results.
> >
> > Does this sound reasonable?
> >
>
> Can we bump the version # if there is any change as well as
> the "date" string everyday? It can be done via a nightly cron job.
That just seems like overkill at this time. It's not clear that we
need the version # to change every time.
And the cost of doing that is noticable -- we would have had over 700
versions by now, and each and every one that you built and installed
would have gone into its own install directory.
I just haven't seen that much ambiguity in bug reports and such that
leads me to believe that we need to bump the version # for each checkin.
If we do see lots of problems of this nature, then changing the version
number more rapidly would make sense.
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list