Direct CVS Access to egcs sources
Dave Love
d.love@dl.ac.uk
Sun Feb 8 08:57:00 GMT 1998
>>>>> "Gerald" == Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
Gerald> On Sun, 8 Feb 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>> How about we continue to bump the version # for snapshots, but change
>> the "date" string via a nightly cron job?
Gerald> Yes, please do that.
Gerald> If it does not prove sufficient, we can always change to an
Gerald> even finer grained version labeling later. The daily change
Gerald> defintely will be useful.
Why isn't the usual `ident' mechanism appropriate, given you can't
guarantee the integrity of a given set of sources, even WRT a given
date? Do the potentially-annoying problems with patches swing it or
something else?
More information about the Gcc
mailing list