Warning elimination patches.
Kaveh R. Ghazi
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
Sat Feb 7 12:08:00 GMT 1998
> From: Robert Lipe <robertl@dgii.com>
>
> I just wanted Kaveh to know he wasn't alone and his work was
> appreciated. :-) So I knocked off a couple hundred warnings.
>
Thanks, its much appreciated. :-)
> Yes, I know that the rules say to submit one change per patch and one
> patch per email. If that's really the rule, I'll gladly obey. I
> suspect that for relatively brainless patches like this, it would
> actually be harder to grok.
>
I've been sending patches of similar size and scope, and Jeff
hasn't complained, probably because your reasoning is sound.
> I didn't go for zero warnings in every file I touched. I went for
> the really easy ones that were self-evident.
Yup, I do the same. Seems to work well.
I would suggest the same string.h/strings.h change as I did for your
last patch. I think this is convention because some platforms have
conflicts between these two headers so we never get both, just prefer
string.h when its available.
Thanks,
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi Project Manager / Custom Development
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu ICon CMT Corp.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list