Warning elimination patches.

Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
Sat Feb 7 12:08:00 GMT 1998


 > From: Robert Lipe <robertl@dgii.com>
 > 
 > I just wanted Kaveh to know he wasn't alone and his work was
 > appreciated. :-) So I knocked off a couple hundred warnings.
 > 

	Thanks, its much appreciated. :-)


 > Yes, I know that the rules say to submit one change per patch and one
 > patch per email.  If that's really the rule, I'll gladly obey.  I
 > suspect that for relatively brainless patches like this, it would
 > actually be harder to grok.   
 > 

	I've been sending patches of similar size and scope, and Jeff
hasn't complained, probably because your reasoning is sound.


 > I didn't go for zero warnings in every file I touched.  I went for
 > the really easy ones that were self-evident.

	Yup, I do the same.  Seems to work well.



I would suggest the same string.h/strings.h change as I did for your
last patch.  I think this is convention because some platforms have
conflicts between these two headers so we never get both, just prefer
string.h when its available.

		Thanks,
		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Project Manager / Custom Development
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		ICon CMT Corp.



More information about the Gcc mailing list