K6 patches for review

[Mike Stump]

> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 20:53:53 -0600
> From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>

> It was for a target which is still covered by an NDA.

We all at times have to deal with NDAs.

> It probably would have been better if we had included at least one
> example for a public target.

Well, we can understand that this is hard to do in general.  Another
possibility might have been to just give us all a short primer on it,
send any docs in the code to the list once (for new code), and just be
a a little more responsive (if time permits) than usual on the new
feature.  I must admit, I was sleeping and didn't even know about the
new flexibility.