pre egcs-1.1 testing and Linux 2.1.x

[Raul Miller]

David S. Miller <davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com> wrote:
> And the egcs team has not said the latter.  But they will turn the
> feature off until such time as the fix is made, since it generates
> incorrect code.

Er.. it *sometimes* generates incorrect code.

Wouldn't it be better to simply generate an error ("sorry, but ...")for
cases where it doesn't generate correct code.  [If Linus's usage are
the only known cases where it generates correct code then these would
be base for the template of what's acceptable.]

-- 
Raul