hpux10.20 XPASS regressions from g++-2.8.1 to egcs-19980803

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 199808171514.IAA28987@cygnus.com >you write:
  > 
  > I had been discounting XPASS indications as possible
  > regressions, however the ones in the following list achieved
  > expected FAIL status with gcc-2.8.1 on hpux10.20 by returning ld
  > status 1 and not executing, so these may be cases where only
  > gcc-2.8.1succeeded and both egcs versions failed.  I'm sure
  > others have reported these by now.  It took my HP box 6 hours
  > real time to negotiate the gcc-2.8.1/g77-0.5.23 test.
Your message is almost impossible to decipher.

Please state explicitly what you compiler is showing the XPASS
message and which compiler is showing an XFAIL.  Otherwise I can
do little with messages like this because I can not easily determine
what compilers got particular test results.

jeff

ps.  I know what the 980506 stuff is (I wrote the test to expose
a very obscure problem in the new scheduler) and I will be checking
in a patch soon.